The Big Camera argument: a couple of great articles

I don't even care to count the times I've heard it anymore:

"You've got to have a big, professional looking camera in order to be taken seriously as a pro". 

One guy even went as far as to state that a big camera, preferably one with a grip attached, no matter if you need it or not, serves to "transfix" (sic!) the subject. Which, I guess, has no option left but to obey to the photographer's demands. Oh well...

It's certain I'll return to this matter in future blog installments; for now, let me just state my opinion that the current fascination with "full frame" cameras (as they are erroneously and quite arrogantly known) is just a current fad and marketing plot.

For starters, here are a few great articles from a very talented photographer, which also happens to be a woman.

The first one discusses the "Big Camera" syndrome itself.

Then, there is a couple of articles comparing full frame cameras with the popular micro four thirds system, from the standpoint of a working pro photographer. You can find the first part here, and the sequel here.

Enjoy and stay tuned for more on this (and many other matters) on the blog!

PS: here is a picture courtesy of the great CameraSize site  illustrating some of the points in the linked articles ;)

 

Canon_Oly_camerasize.jpg
Multiple Dance Instances

Multiple Dance Instances

Welcome to the Eyes Unclouded Blog!

0